The Dark Side of Globalisation
Being one of the most successful species on this Earth, mankind has taken its social capabilities to a whole new level. Since the very beginning, mankind have always been seeking one other in distant places in search of better life (Chanda, 2008). This interaction has enabled the transfer of beneficial knowledge and thus mankind as a species has progressed. Technologies soon developed allowing communication with faraway places very easy. Globalisation has resulted in the world to be an intricate interconnected network. Yet this triumph do have its shortcomings as well. Amidst all this positivity that globalisation brings, it has its fair share of problems. Wars and conflicts have always existed since the ancient times and despite the progress globalisation brings, has not reduced nor prevent further conflicts. Ironically, there are examples of globalization-induced wars (Bauman, 2001) where the fruits of some of our progress are fuelling conflicts in other parts of the world like Africa. One such case is the issue of conflict minerals in Congo. The world has realised this and has various measures put in place. ‘Enough Project’ brings awareness to the consumers while companies themselves have joined Public Private Alliance on Responsible Minerals Trade to reduce the consumption of conflict minerals.
The
issue of conflict-minerals is very well known with several countries in Africa
known to export these ‘blood minerals’ notably, Democratic Republic of Congo (“Tech companies make progress on ‘blood phones’ and
‘conflict minerals’ - CNN.com,” n.d.). A conflict mineral is
defined as “columbite-tantalite (coltan), cassiterite, gold, wolframite, or
their derivatives; or any other mineral or its derivatives determined by the
U.S. Secretary of State to be financing conflict in the Democratic Republic of
the Congo (“DRC”) or an adjoining country.” (Reform, 2011) Congo has been conflict torn
over the possession of precious minerals tantalum, tin, gold and tungsten which
are used frequently in many of our IT devices including mobile devices (“Conflict Minerals | RAISE Hope for Congo,” n.d.). These highly sought minerals
has fuelled the need to possess them and razed conflicts in the torn nation.
Armed groups aiming to earn high profit from the sale and export of such
precious minerals has left the country in ravages. They hold workers at
gunpoint forcing them to work for cheap or no pay at all. (“Tech companies make progress on ‘blood phones’ and
‘conflict minerals’ - CNN.com,” n.d.)
In a
highly globalized world of today, many global powerful brands highly influences
the choices and way of life of many consumers in the world. Many corporations
influences the general populace by creating brands and therefore attaining
consumer support. Yet most consumers are concerned if the products they buy
have issues surrounding ethical corporate behaviour. Consumer will make changes
to their purchasing habits against errant corporations (Creyer, 1997). Number one brand in the
Forbes list, Apple Inc. (“The World’s Most Powerful Brands List - Forbes,”
n.d.)
has been found to make use of such conflict minerals in its devices. It has
resulted in many consumers unknowingly supported the bloodshed in the
conflict-torn Congo. The unintended global support for more conflict minerals,
has generated billions in revenue from the sale of Apple devices while plunging
Congo further down the depths of conflict.
Fortunately,
not the entire world have been ignorant of this issue. Efforts have been made
to counter the export and consumption of blood minerals. ‘Enough Project’ aims
to bring awareness to the masses and aims to discourages big corporations from
utilising ‘conflict-minerals’ (“Apple Makes New Pledges on Conflict Minerals, Should
Begin Clean Congo Sourcing Program | Enough Project,” n.d.). Consumers are made aware and
will be trusted to make the responsible choice of not supporting companies and
brands that are adamant in still using the ‘blood-minerals’ in their products
and devices (Creyer, 1997).
Companies
have also pledged to contribute in a global concerted effort. Apple Inc. has
joined the Public Private Alliance on Responsible Minerals Trade and is one of
the many corporations alongside governments and civil societies (“Apple Makes New Pledges on Conflict Minerals, Should
Begin Clean Congo Sourcing Program | Enough Project,” n.d.). This will ensure the
minerals attained are ‘clean’ and therefore reduce the globalised need for the
‘conflict-minerals’. Thus hopefully ending the conflicts that arise in Congo as
the result of such minerals. Although many corporations have pledged against
the consumption of the ‘conflict-minerals’, there will only be real
significance when all industry players are involved. Nintendo, for example,
lagged behind in all procedures to reduce the consumption of such minerals and
is ranked the lowest (“Conflict Minerals Company Rankings | RAISE Hope for
Congo,” n.d.).
Unlike major corporations, like Apple Inc., HP and Intel, Nintendo lacked clear
verification procedures for non-compliance and are still not part of the conflict-free
smelter program (“Nintendo slammed over ‘blood chemicals’,” 2013).
Although
the problem has been reduced with the various measures and legislations in
place, it cannot be denied that globalization was what initiated and fuelled
the conflicts in the first place. The global need for the minerals by
multinational corporations, resulted in the purchase of such minerals from
conflict-laden sources such as mentioned. Tempted by the large profits obtained
from the sale and export of the minerals has fuelled the conflicts further over
the ownership of the mines. The measures and legislations were put in place to
protect Congo from further conflict and ensure corporations obtained their
resources from conflict-free sources. Yet it remains to be seen if the problem
can be completely eradicated when there exists such companies like Nintendo
that have yet to show its fullest support for the conflict-free cause.
References:
Apple Makes New Pledges on Conflict Minerals, Should Begin
Clean Congo Sourcing Program | Enough Project. (n.d.). Retrieved October 06,
2013, from
http://www.enoughproject.org/blogs/apple-new-pledges-conflict-minerals-clean-congo
Bauman,
Z. (2001). Wars of the Globalization Era. European Journal of Social Theory,
4(1), 11–28. doi:10.1177/13684310122224966
Chanda,
N. (2008). Runaway globalization without governance. Global Governance: A
Review of Multilateralism …, 14, 119–125. Retrieved from
http://journals.rienner.com/doi/pdf/10.5555/ggov.2008.14.2.119
Conflict
Minerals | RAISE Hope for Congo. (n.d.). Retrieved October 06, 2013, from
http://www.raisehopeforcongo.org/content/initiatives/conflict-minerals
Conflict
Minerals Company Rankings | RAISE Hope for Congo. (n.d.). Retrieved from
http://www.raisehopeforcongo.org/content/conflict-minerals-company-rankings
Creyer,
E. H. (1997). The influence of firm behavior on purchase intention: do
consumers really care about business ethics? Journal of Consumer Marketing,
14(6), 421–432. doi:10.1108/07363769710185999
Nintendo
slammed over “blood chemicals.” (2013, June 26). Fox News. Retrieved from
http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2013/06/26/nintendo-slammed-over-blood-chemicals/
Reform,
W. S. (2011). Conflict minerals. Journal of Chemical Health and Safety, 18(1),
49–50. doi:10.1016/j.jchas.2010.10.004
Tech
companies make progress on “blood phones” and “conflict minerals” - CNN.com.
(n.d.). Retrieved October 03, 2013, from http://www.cnn.com.sg/2012/08/16/tech/gaming-gadgets/congo-blood-phones-report/index.html
The
World’s Most Powerful Brands List - Forbes. (n.d.). Retrieved October 05, 2013,
from http://www.forbes.com/powerful-brands/list/